Partner-attended · reply within 24 business hours
Corporate transactions, capital markets and strategic deals.
Independent assessment and rigorous valuation of assets and businesses.
Business reinvention, sustainability and wealth management.
Corporate governance, succession and transformation
International tax planning and cross-border structuring.
Regulatory compliance and tax reporting obligations.
Special regimes for individuals and digital assets.
Tax defense and wealth taxes
Corporate immigration, ICT transfers, investor residency, digital nomad and regularisation.
Employment relations, mobility and regulatory protection.
Protection, compliance and digital resilience
Data protection, DPO and AI regulation
Company formation, contracts, shareholder agreements and corporate operations.
Contracts, dismissals, redundancies and labour court representation.
Insolvency proceedings, fresh start, micro-enterprise procedure and dissolution.
Litigation, arbitration, mediation, IP and real estate law.
Accounting, reporting and outsourced financial management.
Entity management, governance and personnel administration.
Incorporation, incentives and business acceleration.
Risk management, continuity and recovery
New guides on the latest Spanish tax and immigration developments.
Practical tools for informed decision-making.
A construction company sought clarification on whether, after agreeing to a payment deferral in 2010 for 2008 invoices, the six-month period to reduce the taxable base due to non-payment began from the date of the first unpaid invoice. The DGT ruled that a deferral agreed after the accrual does not change the nature of the transaction or the statutory deadlines.
Question raised: Taking into account that on June 15, 2010, a deferral was granted for the payment of the due invoices, specifically through a schedule of 6 monthly payments, whether the date on which the first of the scheduled payments resulted in non-payment can be considered the date on which the calculation of the 6 month period referred to in art. 80.Four.A).1ª of the Tax Law must begin and, therefore, whether the requirements for the modification of the tax base are met.
The granting of a deferral to the debtor subsequent to the accrual of the transactions does not qualify the credit as an installment transaction nor does it modify the time limits for the reduction of the tax base. The calculation of the period to consider a credit as uncollectible must be carried out from the initial accrual of the transactions according to their original classification. Therefore, the modification of the tax base is not appropriate if it is carried out outside the legal time limits in force at each moment.
What is published here, applied to a company or a specific case. The first meeting is free.
Partner-attended · reply within 24 business hours
Quick message
We reply within 24 business hours. Confidential handling guaranteed.
Google Meet
Direct slot with the partner. Complimentary consultation · no commitment · cancel up to 24h in advance.
Loading availability…
We're fully booked for the next 14 days.
That's a good sign, and we won't leave you hanging.
Request callback
Tell us a time window and a phone number. A partner will call you back during the chosen slot.
< 24 h reply · direct with partner
Have a specific question? Tell us your situation in a sentence or two: a partner will reply within 24 business hours.
Complimentary 30-minute meeting with the partner responsible for your area. Google Meet or in person. Cancel up to 24h in advance.
Loading availability…
We're fully booked for the next 14 days.
That's a good sign, and we won't leave you hanging.
Tell us your preferred time slot and a phone number. A partner will call you back, with no hold queues and no gatekeepers.
We use our own and third-party cookies to improve your experience. More information
Essential for the website to function. Cannot be disabled.
Help us understand how you use the site to improve it.
Enable relevant content and advertising.