The Directorate General for Legal Certainty and Public Faith has ruled on an appeal against the refusal to register the georeferenced cadastral graphic representation of a property (Art. 199 of the Mortgage Law). The Registrar suspended the registration due to a lack of consistency and identity between the land registry and cadastral records, following allegations from neighbouring owners questioning the plot's ownership. The conflict arises from the existence of another property with the identical plot and polygon numbers in the Land Registry.
For the individual applicant, the ruling maintains the suspension of the graphic base registration as legal certainty regarding the property's identity cannot be guaranteed (Art. 199 of the Mortgage Law). For the neighbouring companies (Liber Novega SL and Rehusa SA), the ruling recognises the disputed nature of the plot and the existence of evidence regarding ownership and agricultural use that contradicts the initial application. The case highlights the risk of discrepancies between the Cadastre and the Land Registry during georeferencing processes.
The administrative team reviews your specific situation.