Skip to content
BOE-A-2026-13186 ·17 June 2026 ·Resolution Low impact
Tax

Preventive annotation of criminal complaint denied if registered owner is not a party to the judicial proceedings

The Directorate General for Legal Certainty and Public Faith has upheld the refusal to grant a preventive annotation of a criminal complaint regarding properties in Adeje. The ruling establishes that for a criminal complaint to be eligible for annotation, it is essential that the registered owner is a party to the judicial proceedings, in compliance with the principle of successive chain of title (legal grounds 2 and 3). The objective is to ensure the effectiveness of the action for the restitution of property that such an annotation entails.

In 2 key points

  1. The registered owner must be a party to the proceedings for the criminal complaint to be eligible for annotation (fundamentos de derecho 3)
  2. The annotation of a criminal complaint requires the registered owner to be summoned to the proceedings to ensure the effectiveness of the action for restitution (fundamentos de derecho 3)

How it affects those involved

For complainants, the ruling limits the ability to protect rights over real estate through preventive annotations if the current owner is not a party to the criminal case (legal ground 3). Registered owners who are not parties to the proceedings remain protected against such annotations. Legal professionals must verify the standing of the registered owner before requesting annotations of criminal complaints to avoid refusals based on a lack of successive chain of title.

Lifecycle

2026-06-17PublishedPublished in the BOE
Official text Based on BOE data (boe.es). Information, not advice.

Does this provision affect you?

The tax team reviews your specific situation.

Talk to the tax team
This analysis is informational only and does not constitute legal advice or create a client-adviser relationship. BM Consulting.
Email
Contact