Skip to content
BOE-A-2026-12267 ·6 June 2026 ·Resolution Low impact
Tax

Adjacent properties to newly registered estates: judicial nullity claims, not registry appeals, are the way to challenge lack of notification

The Directorate General for Legal Certainty and Public Faith has dismissed an appeal against a registrar's refusal to rectify a new registration. The ruling establishes that if proof of dispatch and acknowledgement of receipt are held by the Land Registry, the entry falls under the protection of the courts (Art. 1, third paragraph, Mortgage Law). Consequently, the administrative rectification process is not the appropriate channel to challenge a lack of notification; instead, a claim for nullity must be brought before the courts.

In 2 key points

  1. The completed registration falls under the protection of the courts if proof of dispatch is provided (Art. 1, third paragraph, Mortgage Law) (art. 1, párrafo tercero, Ley Hipotecaria)
  2. Administrative appeals are not the appropriate channel for registry rectification in these circumstances (Fundamentos de Derecho 1)

How it affects those involved

For companies or individuals who consider themselves owners of adjacent properties to a newly registered estate without having been notified, the ruling confirms they cannot obtain rectification through appeals to the Directorate General if the registrar holds proof of dispatch (Art. 1, third paragraph, Mortgage Law). The risk for the affected party is the loss of administrative recourse, forcing them to bear the costs and timelines of judicial nullity proceedings to protect their property rights.

Lifecycle

2026-06-06PublishedPublished in the BOE
Official text Based on BOE data (boe.es). Information, not advice.

Does this provision affect you?

The tax team reviews your specific situation.

Talk to the tax team
This analysis is informational only and does not constitute legal advice or create a client-adviser relationship. BM Consulting.
Email
Contact