Skip to content
BOE-A-2026-11143 ·23 May 2026 ·Resolution Low impact
Tax

Companies with duplicated mortgages: 30 days to justify preventive annotation or it is denied

The resolution denies preventive annotation due to double registration, in accordance with rule eight of article 209.1 of the Mortgage Law. The appeal was submitted by a company (Bullblok Machinery, S.L.U.) through a digitally signed document dated September 19, 2025. The decision is based on double registration, which prevents the practice of preventive annotation under current law (art. 209.1, rule eight).

In 2 key points

  1. Preventive annotation is denied due to dual registration (art. 209.1, regla octava)
  2. The appeal was submitted via a digitally signed written document on 19 September 2025 (fecha: 19 de septiembre de 2025)

How it affects those involved

For companies managing mortgages, this means that if there are dual registrations, they will not be able to carry out preventive annotations without justifying their situation. Real estate lawyers and property managers should review registration records to avoid errors. Registration authorities continue to uphold the rule on dual registration as the basis for denial. Advisors must inform their clients of the risk of denial if the situation is not properly justified.

Lifecycle

2026-05-23PublishedPublished in the BOE
Official text Based on BOE data (boe.es). Information, not advice.

Does this provision affect you?

The tax team reviews your specific situation.

Talk to the tax team
This analysis is informational only and does not constitute legal advice or create a client-adviser relationship. BM Consulting.
Email
Contact