How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
In the transfer of capital or rights of use and enjoyment, there is a presumption of remuneration that requires the transaction to be valued at normal market value. This presumption is rebutted if the taxpayer proves the gratuitous nature of the transaction through evidence admitted under Law. In the case of fees, valuation at market value only applies if the service is provided free of charge or if the agreed remuneration is notoriously lower than the normal value.
The DGT's position remains constant in applying the presumption of remuneration and the requirement to value at normal market value when gratuitousness is not proven. The doctrine has maintained the burden of proof on the taxpayer to demonstrate the absence of income. Ruling V0565-25 specifies that market valuation is not automatic in the case of low fees, but rather requires the difference to be notorious.
Turning points
-
Specifies that valuation at market value is not automatically triggered by setting low fees, but rather the remuneration must be notoriously lower than the normal value.
Analysis based on 19 of 19 rulings with a stated position. Updated 25 September 2026.