How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
Medical, surgical, and healthcare services are exempt from IVA (Value Added Tax) only if their purpose is the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of diseases, injuries, or congenital physical defects. Interventions with purely aesthetic or cosmetic purposes are taxed at the general rate of 21%. The exemption requires an objective medical purpose and the patient's subjective perception is not sufficient. The leasing of operating rooms or healthcare personnel to perform aesthetic surgery does not benefit from the exemption as it does not constitute medical assistance in itself.
The DGT's position remains constant in the distinction between therapeutic and aesthetic purposes. Over the years, the administration has specified that the exemption depends on the objective nature of the intervention and not on the patient's perception. Likewise, it has been clarified that the leasing of facilities or personnel for aesthetic purposes does not qualify as exempt medical assistance.
Turning points
-
Establishes that the exemption cannot be based on the patient's subjective perception, requiring that the medical purpose be based on findings by qualified personnel.
-
Determines that the leasing of hospital facilities for aesthetic surgery is taxed at 21% as it does not constitute medical assistance for the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of diseases.
Analysis based on 13 of 13 rulings with a stated position. Updated 26 September 2026.