Skip to content
BOE-A-2026-2794 ·6 February 2026 ·Resolution Low impact
Tax

Companies: Directorate General overturns Mercantile Registry rejection due to lack of reasoning in decision

The Directorate General for Legal Certainty and Public Faith has upheld the appeal filed by the company 'Calzada Solar, SL' against the refusal of the III Mercantile Registrar of Seville to file the 2022 annual accounts. The rejection was based on an alleged incorrect completion of the beneficial ownership identification declaration (Art. 18 of the Commercial Code and Art. 6 of the Mercantile Registry Regulations). However, the decision was overturned on the grounds that the registrar failed to provide sufficient reasoning for the refusal, thereby preventing the company from defending its legal position.

In 2 key points

  1. The negative decision is overturned due to insufficient reasoning in the registrar's resolution (III)
  2. The decision must state the reason justifying the refusal to allow for a legal defence (art. 326 de la Ley Hipotecaria)

How it affects those involved

For companies filing annual accounts, this ruling reinforces the requirement that Mercantile Registrars' decisions must clearly state the ratio decidendi to allow for rectification or defence (Art. 326 of the Mortgage Law). In this specific case, the company achieved the reversal of the refusal without needing to address the merits of the error in the beneficial ownership declaration. Directors must ensure that notification of registrar decisions is sufficiently clear to allow for the presentation of legal arguments.

Lifecycle

2026-02-06PublishedPublished in the BOE
Official text Based on BOE data (boe.es). Information, not advice.

Does this provision affect you?

The tax team reviews your specific situation.

Talk to the tax team
This analysis is informational only and does not constitute legal advice or create a client-adviser relationship. BM Consulting.
Email
Contact