Skip to content
BOE-A-2026-16139 ·24 July 2026 ·Resolution not-relevant
Administrative

Rejection of registry conciliation: Directorate General confirms it is not applicable to disputes over sale validity or legal capacity

The Directorate General for Legal Certainty and Public Trust has upheld the rejection of a registry conciliation request based on Article 103 bis of the Mortgage Law. The dispute concerned the validity of a sale and the capacity of directors, matters which Article 3 of Organic Law 1/2025 excludes from the scope of registry conciliation as they do not constitute real estate, urban planning, or registrable fact disputes.

In 2 key points

  1. Exclusion of subject matter: conciliation is not applicable to the validity of sales or legal capacity (Article 3 of Organic Law 1/2025) (art. 3 de la Ley Orgánica 1/2025)
  2. The scope of Article 103 bis of the Mortgage Law is limited to real estate, urban planning, or registrable fact disputes (art. 103 bis de la Ley Hipotecaria)

How it affects those involved

The path is blocked for individuals and lawyers seeking to use registry conciliation (Article 103 bis of the Mortgage Law) to resolve disputes regarding contract validity or the capacity of the parties. The ruling establishes that if a dispute requires addressing insolvency or capacity issues, it cannot be processed through this route, as these are excluded by Organic Law 1/2025 (Article 3).

Lifecycle

2026-07-24PublishedPublished in the BOE
Official text Based on BOE data (boe.es). Information, not advice.

Does this provision affect you?

The administrative team reviews your specific situation.

Talk to the administrative team
This analysis is informational only and does not constitute legal advice or create a client-adviser relationship. BM Consulting.
Email
Contact