Skip to content
BOE-A-2026-14848 ·8 July 2026 ·Resolution Low impact
Tax

Land Registrars: cannot suspend registrations if the third-party possessor was notified of the proceedings, even if not sued

The Directorate General for Legal Certainty and Public Faith has overturned a Land Registrar's negative assessment, which had suspended the registration of an adjudication decree because no formal claim had been filed against the third-party possessor. The ruling establishes that notification of the mortgage foreclosure proceedings is sufficient to comply with Articles 685 and 689 of the Civil Procedure Law (Art. III). It was determined that requiring an express claim against the third-party possessor constitutes an excessive formalism not provided for by law.

In 2 key points

  1. Notification of the proceedings is sufficient to comply with Articles 685 and 689 of the Civil Procedure Law (art. III)
  2. No lack of legal defence exists if the third-party possessor has been informed and has been able to exercise their rights (art. II)

How it affects those involved

For financial institutions and companies acquiring assets through mortgage foreclosures (such as Corelsa Gestión, S.L.), legal certainty is guaranteed regarding the registration of adjudications without the need for additional requirements for a formal claim against the third-party possessor, provided prior notification has been given (Art. III). Land Registrars' ability to issue negative assessments is limited in the absence of a formal claim against the third-party possessor if that party has already been informed of the proceedings (Art. III).

Lifecycle

2026-07-08PublishedPublished in the BOE
Official text Based on BOE data (boe.es). Information, not advice.

Does this provision affect you?

The tax team reviews your specific situation.

Talk to the tax team
This analysis is informational only and does not constitute legal advice or create a client-adviser relationship. BM Consulting.
Email
Contact