Skip to content
Tax & legal glossary Tax

Controlled Foreign Corporation Regime — Spain (Transparencia Fiscal Internacional / TFI)

Spain's Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) regime — known as transparencia fiscal internacional or TFI — is the anti-deferral mechanism set out in Art. 91 LIRPF (for individuals) and Art. 100 LIS (for companies). It allows the Spanish Tax Agency to attribute to a Spanish resident shareholder certain income earned by a low-taxed foreign controlled entity, even if that entity has not distributed any dividend. The regime was significantly strengthened by Law 11/2021 (ATAD II transposition).

Spain's Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) regime — known as transparencia fiscal internacional or TFI — is the anti-deferral mechanism set out in Art. 91 LIRPF (for individuals) and Art. 100 LIS (for companies). It allows the Spanish Tax Agency to attribute to a Spanish resident shareholder certain income earned by a low-taxed foreign controlled entity, even if that entity has not distributed any dividend. The regime was significantly strengthened by Law 11/2021 (ATAD II transposition).

In practice

What Is Spain’s CFC Regime (TFI)?

Spain’s transparencia fiscal internacional (TFI) regime is an anti-avoidance mechanism designed to prevent Spanish tax residents from deferring taxation indefinitely by accumulating income in low-taxed foreign controlled entities. Rather than waiting for the entity to distribute dividends, the Spanish Tax Agency (AEAT) attributes the passive income earned by the foreign entity directly to the resident shareholder in the year the entity generates it.

The regime is codified in Art. 91 of Law 35/2006 (LIRPF) for individuals and in Art. 100 of Law 27/2014 (LIS) for companies, as amended by Law 11/2021, of July 9, on measures to prevent and combat tax fraud (BOE-A-2021-11473), which transposed the ATAD II Directive (EU Directive 2016/1164).

The Four Cumulative Conditions of Art. 91 LIRPF

TFI is triggered only when all four of the following conditions are satisfied simultaneously:

1. Control ≥ 50%: The taxpayer, alone or together with related entities or family members up to the second degree, holds an interest “equal to or greater than 50 percent of the capital, equity, earnings or voting rights” of the non-resident entity at the close of its fiscal year.

2. Low taxation (effective rate < 75% of Spanish IS): The tax paid by the foreign entity on income of a type identical or analogous to Corporate Tax “is less than 75 percent of the tax that would have applied” under Spanish IS rules. With Spain’s nominal IS rate of 25%, the threshold is an effective rate of 18.75% at the foreign entity level. A single-member LLC that pays no US corporate tax clearly satisfies this condition.

3. Insufficient substance (Art. 91.2 LIRPF): If the entity does not have “the corresponding organization of material and human resources for the conduct of its activity,” all of the entity’s income — active and passive alike — is attributed to the shareholder.

4. Passive income > 15% of total income (Art. 91.3 LIRPF): Where sufficient substance does exist, passive income is specifically attributed if it exceeds 15% of the entity’s total revenues. The categories of passive income are broad and include: income from real property, dividends and equity participations, returns on capital lending, capitalization and insurance operations, intellectual and industrial property, leasing of movable assets, asset-disposal gains, financial derivatives (except hedges of own operations), credit and insurance activities with related Spanish clients, and low-value-added intragroup operations.

What Changed with Law 11/2021: ATAD II Extension

The 2021 reform expanded the scope of attributable income to include income from foreign permanent establishments subject to low taxation. It also replaced the term “tax haven” with “non-cooperative jurisdiction” and eliminated the former exemption for participations held for at least one year. The carve-out for EU/EEA entities with genuine economic activity (Art. 91.14 LIRPF) is preserved, but it does not cover US entities.

TFI vs. the Income Attribution Regime: Which Applies When

Confusion between TFI and the income attribution regime is common, because both result in income being attributed to the shareholder without an actual distribution. The structural difference is clear:

  • The income attribution regime (Arts. 86–90 LIRPF) applies when the foreign entity is itself fiscally transparent under the criteria of DGT Resolution BOE-A-2020-2108 (it pays no tax at source and attributes income to partners automatically). No control threshold or low-tax condition is required.
  • The TFI regime (Art. 91 LIRPF) applies to entities that are not transparent in their home jurisdiction but satisfy the four anti-deferral conditions. It requires ≥ 50% control and a low-tax environment. Only passive income is attributed (or all income if there is no substance).

For an opaque US LLC (one that does not meet the three BOE-A-2020-2108 criteria), TFI is the regime that could be triggered if the Spanish shareholder holds 50% or more and income is predominantly passive.

Dual Exposure: TFI and GILTI in Parallel

For a US citizen who is also a Spanish tax resident and who controls a foreign entity, a simultaneous dual exposure is possible: the GILTI regime in the US (IRC §951A) and the TFI regime in Spain (Art. 91 LIRPF). Both regimes can attribute the same passive income to the same taxpayer, albeit through different mechanisms and at different rates. The Spain–US tax treaty does not fully resolve this overlap, making this scenario one of the most complex in international tax practice.

Related service

Tax & Fiscal

View service
Back to glossary

DGT Observatory

Related DGT tax rulings

V1067-26

Spanish resident's foreign property donation via Jersey trust taxed under regional law

A Spanish resident enquires about the taxation of a donation of a London property made through a Jersey trust. The DGT determines that, as the trust is not recognised in Spain, the donation is treated as a direct transfer from the settlor to the beneficiary.

2026
V2138-24

Dividends from Chilean subsidiaries not subject to international transparency tax if exempt under art. 21 LIS

The Spanish company T owns 96% of Chilean company C, which holds operating subsidiaries in Chile from which it receives dividends fully exempt in Chile. The DGT concludes that no international transparency tax (art. 100 LIS) applies because, if the dividends had been received in Spain, they would have been exempt under art. 21 LIS with a 5% management cost reduction, meaning Chilean taxation is not lower than the Spanish rate.

2024
V1826-24

German GbR deemed rental attribution entity; non-resident partner's income taxed under IRNR

A German GbR develops software with two partners, one resident in Spain and one in Germany, both exercising contracting power from their respective countries. The DGT concludes that the GbR is a rental attribution entity, not resident for Hispano-German tax treaty purposes due to German tax transparency, and that the German partner's activities in Spain constitute a permanent establishment. The entity is taxed as an IRNR contributor for the income attributable to the non-resident partner and must file an annual self-assessment.

2024
V1003-24

Dividends from tax transparency regimes or family holding companies are not subject to Personal Income Tax

A query was raised regarding whether profits distributed by a company taxed under tax transparency regimes or family holding companies are exempt from taxation. The Directorate General for Taxes (DGT) ruled that such dividends are not subject to Personal Income Tax (IRPF) for the shareholders, nor are they subject to withholding tax.

2024
V0480-24

No international fiscal transparency or income attribution applies to EU harmonised investment funds

The DGT confirms that investors in a Luxembourg harmonised investment fund are subject to the special regime for collective investment schemes.

2024
V3220-23

Rents from French transparent entities not countable for SOCIMI rent coefficient

A SOCIMI society asks whether rents attributed by French transparent entities (SCI and SNC) after a merger can be counted to meet the SOCIMI rent coefficient. The DGT confirms these rents are not considered suitable for this purpose.

2023

Binding rulings from Spain's Directorate General for Taxes (DGT). Each ficha is published in Spanish.

Browse all DGT tax rulings →
Email
Contact