Skip to content
BOE-A-2026-11697 ·1 June 2026 ·Act critical
Administrative

The Senate must proceed with the processing of Amendment 8 introducing the fourteenth additional provision to the draft law on...

The Constitutional Court has ruled that the dissenting opinion signed on 15 September 2025 by the Secretary of State for Relations with the Courts and Constitutional Affairs cannot prevent the processing of Amendment 8, proposed by the People's Parliamentary Group and approved by the Senate Plenary. This amendment introduces a fourteenth additional provision to the draft law amending the Air Navigation and Air Safety laws. The analysis confirms that the conflict of competence is invalid; therefore, the amendment must continue through its legislative process (art. 2 of the analysis).

In 2 key points

  1. The Senate may proceed with Amendment 8 without impediment from the dissenting opinion (art. 2 del análisis)
  2. The amendment introduces a fourteenth additional provision to the draft law on air navigation and safety (texto del conflicto)

How it affects those involved

For the Senate, the right to process Amendment 8 without obstruction from the dissenting opinion is guaranteed. For the Ministry of Constitutional Affairs, the validity of the dissenting opinion signed on 15 September 2025 is annulled. For the air transport and safety sectors, the continuity of the legislative process affecting navigation and safety regulations is ensured. Constitutional law advisors should update their analyses regarding conflicts of competence in aviation matters.

Lifecycle

2026-06-01PublishedPublished in the BOE
2026-06-01Into forceComes into force (texto del conflicto)
Official text Based on BOE data (boe.es). Information, not advice.

Does this provision affect you?

The administrative team reviews your specific situation.

Talk to the administrative team
This analysis is informational only and does not constitute legal advice or create a client-adviser relationship. BM Consulting.
Email
Contact