Skip to content
Wholesale Trade legal

Commercial debt portfolio recovery

We managed the recovery of a commercial debt portfolio worth €2.8M with a 92% success rate.

The challenge

A wholesale distributor with €2.8M in overdue receivables across 47 debtors. Internal collection efforts had failed for over 6 months. Systematic recovery was needed without damaging existing commercial relationships.

Our approach

Client context

A nationwide wholesale food distributor had built its receivables book over years of extending trade credit to a diverse base of clients — from small independent grocers to regional supermarket chains. The company’s commercial model depended on credit terms as a competitive differentiator, and the internal credit management function had grown organically without formal processes for escalating overdue accounts beyond reminder letters.

When a combination of economic pressures on the SME client base and operational gaps in the company’s collections process allowed overdue receivables to accumulate, the finance director found the company facing a liquidity crisis that threatened to force an increase in bank credit within three months.

Challenge

A nationwide wholesale food distributor was facing a liquidity crisis caused by an overdue receivables portfolio that had reached €2.8 million. The 47 debtors ranged from small local businesses owing a few thousand euros to regional chains with balances exceeding €200,000.

The internal collections team had exhausted amicable approaches over more than six months with no significant results. The situation was particularly delicate because many of the debtors were long-standing clients with whom the company wished to maintain commercial relationships after resolving the outstanding debts. A blunt or legally aggressive approach across the entire portfolio risked destroying commercial relationships that had taken years to build and represented future revenue that exceeded the outstanding balances. Meanwhile, the company’s finance director had calculated that the unresolved receivables were creating a funding gap that would require additional bank credit within three months if not addressed.

BMC approach

BMC began with a two-week diagnostic phase before taking any legal action. The internal collections team provided access to the full debtor ledger, account histories, and records of prior contact attempts. We cross-referenced each debtor against public insolvency registries, credit bureau data, and Companies House filings to assess current financial status and enforcement viability.

This analysis allowed us to design a triage system that classified all 47 cases into three categories based on balance amount, debt age, debtor solvency, and commercial relationship value — each requiring a different approach.

Category one covered the eleven debtors with balances above €100,000 who showed no signs of financial distress. For these cases, BMC initiated direct negotiations led by a senior lawyer rather than a collections operative. The framing was deliberately commercial rather than adversarial: we proposed structured payment plans over three to six months, secured by post-dated cheques or standing order mandates, and offered a modest early settlement discount on the oldest tranches of debt in exchange for formalised payment commitments. In eight of eleven cases, agreements were reached within the first thirty days.

Category two addressed the nineteen debtors experiencing genuine cash flow difficulties where the underlying business remained viable. For these cases, we negotiated partial write-off agreements in exchange for immediate payment of an agreed proportion of the outstanding balance. Write-off percentages ranged from 15% to 35% depending on debt age and the debtor’s documented financial position. Each agreement included a confidentiality clause and a full waiver of future claims on the written-off amount. While the absolute recoveries in this category were lower, they were received immediately in cash and preserved the possibility of renewed trading.

Category three comprised the remaining seventeen debtors where negotiation produced no substantive progress within thirty days. For debts below €250,000, BMC initiated proceso monitorio proceedings — Spain’s expedited commercial debt recovery mechanism. For larger amounts, we filed enforcement actions. Critically, we maintained open negotiation channels in parallel with legal proceedings, and in six of these seventeen cases, debtors came forward with settlement proposals once formal proceedings began. The decision to escalate in each case followed a predefined timeline agreed with the client at project outset.

Results

Within four months, €2.6 million was recovered — a 92% recovery rate on the total portfolio. Seventy-eight percent of cases were resolved through negotiated out-of-court settlements, preserving commercial relationships in the majority of instances. Only eleven cases required completed court proceedings, of which nine produced favourable first-instance rulings. The remaining two debtors were found to have entered formal insolvency after the diagnostic analysis; their claims were correctly filed in the respective insolvency proceedings and rank as ordinary unsecured creditors.

The exercise produced a secondary benefit that extended beyond the immediate recovery. BMC’s systematic documentation of all recovery actions, decisions, and outcomes — by debtor category, strategy applied, and result achieved — provided the company’s finance team with a standardised debtor risk framework. This framework was applied to new credit decisions in the months following the project, establishing clear credit limits and escalation triggers that significantly reduced the likelihood of a comparable portfolio accumulation recurring.

Key takeaways

Commercial debt recovery at portfolio scale requires differentiation, not uniformity. Applying the same approach to every debtor — whether uniformly aggressive or uniformly patient — produces predictably poor results. The effective approach is analytical first, then differentiated: understand each debtor’s situation and the creditor’s objectives for that relationship, and design the recovery strategy accordingly. For a business that extends trade credit as a competitive tool, the quality of future credit decisions matters as much as the resolution of past ones — which is why the debt framework that emerged from this project may prove to be its most durable output.

Results

92% portfolio recovery in 4 months, with out-of-court settlements in 78% of cases.

92%
Recovery rate
€2.6M
Amount recovered
78%
Out-of-court settlements
4 months
Resolution time

Client testimonial

They recovered in 4 months what we could not in a year.

CFO, Confidential Wholesale Food Distributor

Achieve similar results

Let us discuss how we can help your business achieve its goals.

Services
Contact
Insights